cpwf.co.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the cpwf.co.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host cpwf.co.uk. Currently, hosted in Denmark and its service provider is One.com A/S .

the related websites

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk gov.uk amazon.co.uk keyliteroofwindows.com beta.companieshouse.gov.uk core.ac.uk mtaa.co.uk kateaveryflowers.co.uk 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

-- comments posts home useful links angling trust federation of welsh game anglers report an incident season extension trials river clwyd catch returns river seiont catch returns season extension trial registration forum initiatives: celtic sea trout initiative conwy valley fisheries & conservation association the golden mile mission statement progress coastal waters newsletters what we are doing. consultations publications welsh salmon and trout association salmon &ta fed of welsh anglers river management good news our responses support us salmon and trout conservation uk. tales & tit bits natural flies know your river last update: 21st april 2018 april 21st, 2018 | proposed new fishing controls to address the decline in stocks of salmon and some sea trout in wales – an update nrw have issues a document as titled above, the introduction of which is posted below. the full document is 13 pages long, so would have swamped the site, so if you wish to read the whole document, click on the link below. click on nrw update . proposed new fishing controls to address the decline in stocks of salmon and some sea trout in wales – an update nrw fisheries team. introduction our salmon stocks are in serious trouble, having declined to historically low levels. the same is true of about half of our sea trout stocks. neither can sustain uncontrolled killing of fish, as it is essential that we ensure all fish have the chance to survive and breed. this phenomenon is widespread across the north atlantic range of salmon, and the other jurisdictions in the british isles and beyond are each currently addressing the same issue in broadly the same way. although there are several contributory reasons to stock decline, including mortality of fish at sea and poor conditions in our rivers including unacceptable agricultural pollution incidents, it is a fundamental requirement to protect our valuable breeding resource of wild fish. although most fishermen have accepted and adapted to the urgent requirement to return the fish they catch, so that they may survive to spawn, some have not. about a quarter of anglers do not practice so-called catch-and release fishing (c&r), preferring to kill the fish they catch. in more normal circumstances this would be acceptable, however the great shortfall in fish now means that currently, killing them is not sustainable. to ensure the conservation of our stocks, nrw concluded that new statutory fishing controls were required. we talked extensively to fishermen and other stakeholders during a two-year process, and this culminated in a statutory consultation in the latter half of 2017 on proposals for new fishing controls. our proposals are for all salmon to be returned, alive and well, to the river by rod and net fishermen, together with restrictions on methods to those commensurate with effective c&r fishing. similar constraints are proposed for the poorly performing sea trout stocks. this note sets out the background to this. may 9th, 2018 | the minister replies to chris's letter click on the minister replies to chris’s letter below. april 21st, 2018 | chris white continues the challenge! 10 april 2018 re: nrw fisheries bylaw proposals – request for an inquiry dear minister, we note in your recent correspondence that you say you will be following the requirements of the water resources act 1991. we draw your attention to schedules 2 and 26 of this act and formally request an inquiry as the objections from the majority of the respondents to the consultation have not been withdrawn. to date our correspondence with your office has been put on hold with no indicative time scale for you to make your decision. in schedule 2 of the act it clearly states that you can only confirm or reject the proposals once all of the objections have been dealt with. to this end all that has been received from your agency (nrw) is a request that objectors withdraw their objections based upon their technical case which is flawed. nrw have simply dismissed our objections claiming that we have not presented any evidence; in march cpwf together with the north west angling trust fisheries consultative committee (nwatfcc) jointly commissioned an independent evaluation of the rivers classification methodology which has been used to justify the proposals (see attached report). the findings and conclusions of this evaluation by consultant statisticians are of such concern that we have requested that the angling trust write to nrw, ea, cefas and nasco requesting that the proposed 2018 measures are suspended based upon the contents of the evaluation. in our correspondence with your office we have provided draft proposals on alternate and interim measures which will achieve better results than the proposed bylaws. it was clear from the outset that there has been pre-determination by nrw in the outcome of the consultation; a similar situation exists in england. nothing in the nrw proposals will reverse the decline in salmon stocks in the short or medium or even long term as the proposals do not address the root cause of the decline, they simply disadvantage the stakeholders. the evidence from 20 years of compulsory catch and release for spring salmon demonstrates the futility of the recommendations in achieving the desired outcome. we would refer you to the comments made by cefas on this issue who advised you that the proposals will have little impact but may be worth doing as there may be some improvement in the long term i.e. it is accepted by nrw that these proposals will do little or nothing to reverse the decline. we would draw your attention that in august 2017 a public notice was placed in the london gazette by the welsh government under its seal based upon the original bylaw proposals which have been subsequently amended. we have taken legal advice concerning the publishing and formal notification in the london gazette asking for objections whilst at the same time running a consultation i.e. were we objecting to bylaws which you had already approved or were we consulting on other options. i would refer you to schedule 26 and the requirement for formal notification following a consultation for a period of 28 days for objections to be lodged, this has not been complied with, there has been no opportunity to object to the amended proposals and you are not therefore in a position to approve the proposals. the present fisheries bylaws are river specific and are to be replaced with a bylaw which covers all rivers i.e. a national welsh fisheries regulation and not a bylaw. i would again refer you to schedule 26 and the need to revoke the existing bylaws before the new bylaws are enacted, i am not aware of any notice of revocation. it is our preference to hold meaningful discussions on how salmon stocks can be conserved after all as stakeholders we know our own rivers best and are their guardians, it is not in our best interest to destroy our fish stocks as implied in the proposed nrw bylaws. the draft interim proposals and pausing of the proposed consultation bylaw measures gives all parties the opportunity to engage and frame a constructive partnership approach that will conserve and benefit fish stocks, fisheries and communities for the long term. regards chris white conservation officer: april 21st, 2018 | appeal from the campaign for the protection of rural wales brecon & radnor committee dear mr eardley and mr white – intensive poultry units and river pollution i am writing to you about a petition which the brecon and radnor branch of the campaign for the protection of rural wales (cprw) have submitted to the welsh assembly petitions committee and to ask you whether you would be able to help us to achieve our goal of 5000 signatures. we have taken this action after a number of meetings with powys county council and natural resources wales to discuss the environmental impacts of intensive poultry units, chief among these being impacts on water quali

URL analysis for cpwf.co.uk

http://www.cpwf.co.uk/campaign/a-further-letter-to-the-minister/
http://www.cpwf.co.uk/campaign/fish-legal/
http://www.cpwf.co.uk/campaign/ea-publications/river-management/
http://www.cpwf.co.uk/campaign/the-voice-of-reason-chris-white/
http://www.cpwf.co.uk/campaign/environment-agency-release-briefing-note-on-tackling-illegal-activity/
http://www.cpwf.co.uk/campaign/season-extension-trials/
http://www.cpwf.co.uk/campaign/initiatives/conwy-valley-fisheries-conservation-association/
http://www.cpwf.co.uk/campaign/another-petition-against-the-proposed-rule-changes/
http://www.cpwf.co.uk/campaign/season-extension-trials/season-extension-trial-registration/
http://www.cpwf.co.uk/campaign/useful-links/
http://www.cpwf.co.uk/campaign/comments/feed/
http://www.cpwf.co.uk/campaign/our-responses/
http://www.cpwf.co.uk/campaign/leon-roskilly-joins-the-campaign/
http://www.cpwf.co.uk/campaign/about/
http://www.cpwf.co.uk/campaign/another-letter-to-lesley-griffiths-by-john-eardley/
nikalsystems.co.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain name:
cpwf.co.uk

Data validation:
Nominet was able to match the registrant's name and address against a 3rd party data source on 10-Dec-2012

Registrar:
One.com A/S [Tag = TJNF-DK]
URL: http://www.one.com

Relevant dates:
Registered on: 17-May-2008
Expiry date: 17-May-2019
Last updated: 17-Apr-2018

Registration status:
Registered until expiry date.

Name servers:
ns01.one.com
ns02.one.com

WHOIS lookup made at 07:39:23 26-Jun-2018

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2018.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at https://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER co.uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS cpwf.co.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

SPONSOR
One.com A/S [Tag = TJNF-DK]
URL: http://www.one.com
Relevant dates:

  CREATED 17-May-2008

  CHANGED 17-Apr-2018

STATUS
Registered until expiry date.

NSERVER

  NS01.ONE.COM 195.206.121.10

  NS02.ONE.COM 195.206.121.138

  NAME cpwf.co.uk

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2018.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at https://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED no

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .